I wasn't snarking, merely asking for information. I thought the bare
shoulders were wrong for the period, even as "extreme" fashion, and wanted
to confirm my opinion.

Kate Bunting

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Lavolta Press <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh sure, I just don't understand why some people think it's so much fun to
> get together and tear someone down. Which is really what's happening in a
> lot of those discussions. Some feel snarking is off limits with people they
> know, but the movie/TV industry is fair game.
>
> Fran
>
>
>
> On 1/5/2016 1:14 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>> If we all liked the same thing, there would only be vanilla ice cream, as
>> they say.
>>
>>
>> Ann Wass
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lavolta Press <[email protected]>
>> To: Historical Costume <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Tue, Jan 5, 2016 2:17 pm
>> Subject: Re: [h-cost] Costumes in "War and Peace"
>>
>> I gave up on snarking at movie costumes many years ago.  Movies are
>> fiction. They are not documentaries, they are not meant to be
>> educational, and they are not made primarily for viewing by historic
>> reenactors. In many, much of the history itself is, at best, speculation.
>>
>> I don't watch movies for the costumes. I watch them to see whether it's
>> good drama and looking for things to criticize just spoils the drama.
>> When I want solid information I look elsewhere. And really, some of the
>> Facebook discussions sound just like catty little junior-high girls
>> gleefully tearing down each other's clothes.
>>
>> Fran
>> Lavolta Press
>> www.lavoltapress.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/5/2016 2:59 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>>> Some of my Facebook friends are following. No one shoulder bare, or
>>> many, many, other things. I know it's theater, but even allowing for that,
>>> seems very weird. My opinion is, even though it is a story, it is based so
>>> firmly in a historical time and place, it seems downright strange to go off
>>> on such flights of fancy. Wonder if there will be a "making of" wherein it
>>> is explained?
>>>
>>> Ann Wass
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> h-costume mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> h-costume mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
>
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to