Hi, > In-memory db is much more faster. But I need to mix > persistent data with runtime data in one db
> need to be recreated each time that is not very cool thing... So you want that the table definition is persisted but the data is not persisted? Sorry this feature is not supported. I believe this is not a very common scenario, sorry. > How do > you think is it very hard to implement? May be I'll prepare patch > myself? I'm not sure yet if I want to support this feature. Of course you could create a patch, it is probably not that complicated once you understand the source code. See also http://www.h2database.com/html/build.html#providing_patches Regards, Thomas --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 Database" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/h2-database?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
