It is already structured this way, you can use the MVStore layer
independently on the SQL layer

On Thu, 23 Jan 2025 at 22:52, 'Mike Goodwin' via H2 Database <
[email protected]> wrote:

> This is probably a bit of stretch, but I was wondering if there was any
> appetite for restructuring h2 so it works better as a relational db library.
>
> That is to say something like this. Ideally the code would exist in
> separate folders (or even better separate sub modules, which compile
> independently). The type system (and the database meta) would have to
> become somehow plugable and not hardcoded as it is currently.
>
> h2 sql/tools/types ->  h2 rdbms -> mvstore
>
> This would be a big improvement in my opinion. The sql aspect whilst
> important to a lot of people also represents a lot of complexity.
>
> I will probably go down this route for my own purposes, but assuming the
> split could be done well, would the project want to incorporate such
> changes?
>
> regards,
>
> Mike
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "H2 Database" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/CAOZwqwn-rYSZ0WznRq4f8VXkeW_6EVtWb-C%2Bvjef%2BJ-qBktBEQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/CAOZwqwn-rYSZ0WznRq4f8VXkeW_6EVtWb-C%2Bvjef%2BJ-qBktBEQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "H2 
Database" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/h2-database/CAFYHVnVXx6-qwsGpDNaYvvxdJRr2bxRBpHwmCwX9LaXr3mwxww%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to