On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Chris J. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From reading this whole thread, I see this problem as one of purpose, not > license. > Yes, we just had to clear up misconceptions. > So, I vote +1 for -extras being a repo that houses any plugin/class/theme > that is built for Habari regardless of license. In our intro to -extras we > explain the benefits of licensing your work under the ASL (possible > inclusion in core, etc) but in no way mandate it. > They do have to be ASL-compatible to use the Habari plugin API without violating our ASL licensing, but I think Extras should be an open home for the entire community to build around and rely upon. I don't think it has anything to do with core itself or as an entry-path to core development, regardless of what the impression may have been originally. +1 for openness --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
