On Jan 9, 11:14 pm, "Ali B." <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Arthus Erea <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Considering it is one of the primary goals of 0.6, I believe ACL
> > should be blocker and we shouldn't freeze until it is (actually)
> > implemented.
We probably have different ideas of what "feature freeze" means, but
my understanding is that since it's already something in trunk, it's
not part of a freeze. But yes, obviously a primary goal of the hack-a-
thon is to flesh out ACL.
>
> I believe the system itself is implemented and functional. All what's left
> are the default privileges, the interface and some other scattered bits. But
> yeah, I would say that this "feature" is definitely a blocker. Without it,
> 0.6 is of no noticeable new features.
I would argue enough has been changed and fixed, that pushing a .6
release out without finalizing ACL would be beneficial, however, I'm
not advocating *NOT* fleshing it out.
>
> Speaking of 0.6 features, are we near the implementation of the taxonomy
> system? Did we decide to push it to 0.7?
I was always under the impression that it was a.7 or .8 item. That
said, I've seen some discussion about actually writing some wrapper
classes to include in this release. I really think next weekend will
be the determining factor.
~miklb
>
> --
> Ali B / dmondarkhttp://www.awhitebox.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/habari-dev
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
