On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 20:49 +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: > nobody for an ok? >
i'm okay. but why not remove it completely? > slattach is not used anymore, the same functionality is provided, in a > better > way, by ldattach. > > > Anfang der weitergeleiteten E-Mail: > > >Von: Marc Balmer <m...@msys.ch> > >Datum: 19. Mai 2009 22:32:20 GMT+02:00 > >An: hackers@aeriebsd.org > >Betreff: first step to remove slattach > > > >slattach(8) has long been superseeded by ldattach(8). First step to > >remove > >it by unlinking it from the build. > > > >ok? > > > >Index: sbin/Makefile > >=================================================================== > >RCS file: /cvs/src/sbin/Makefile,v > >retrieving revision 1.2 > >diff -u -r1.2 Makefile > >--- sbin/Makefile 26 Dec 2008 18:50:47 -0000 1.2 > >+++ sbin/Makefile 19 May 2009 20:30:14 -0000 > >@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ > > mount_vnd mount_xfs mountd ncheck_ffs newfs newfs_msdos \ > > nfsd nologin pdisk pfctl pflogd ping ping6 quotacheck \ > > reboot restore route rtsol savecore scan_ffs \ > >- scsi shutdown slattach swapctl sysctl ttyflags tunefs \ > >+ scsi shutdown swapctl sysctl ttyflags tunefs \ > > umount wpa-psk wsconsctl > > > >.include <bsd.subdir.mk> > > > >-- > >Marc Balmer, Micro Systems, Wiesendamm 2a, Postfach, CH-4019 Basel, > >Switzerland > >http://www.msys.ch/ http://www.vnode.ch/ "In God we trust, in > >C we code." >
