> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:06:18PM +0200, rembrandt wrote: >> On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:02:03 +0000 >> Michael Shalayeff <mic...@lucifier.net> wrote: >> >> > re >> > perhaps you can spend a few words explaining why? >> > cu >> >> inetd wastes ram. > > don't tell me your browser uses less... > any single piece of software we are using on our > desktop machines uses million times more. > why not start picking on the big guys instead > of hitting tiny little fellas everyone likes?..
Well see it as a start. And: 'course I can.. You can do more so it aint that fair to messure me like a kernel developer. ;-) > if you are concerned about memory so much then perhaps you wanna > look in uvm,pool,etc memory (unpagable!) used in the kernel. > if you save a megabyte there that might be worth a shot... > cu You're right but I just keep my point of view. There is no loss during not starting inetd or commenting out all services it normaly starts. I wont argue 'course there's more importent work to do but I still think that there is no need for a inetd to get started automaticaly. Those who need something can still start it manualy. And please keep in mind: I don't talk about removing it. ;-) It was just something I was able to submit. regards, Rembrandt
