On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 02:25:00PM +0000, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 14:27 +0100, Pedro Martelletto wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 07:27:42PM +0000, konrad merz wrote:
> > > Index: usr.sbin/icbd/cmd.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/icbd/cmd.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.19
> > > diff -u -p -r1.19 cmd.c
> > > --- usr.sbin/icbd/cmd.c   23 Jun 2009 13:39:33 -0000      1.19
> > > +++ usr.sbin/icbd/cmd.c   30 Dec 2009 19:06:18 -0000
> > > @@ -227,9 +227,15 @@ icb_cmd_topic(struct icb_cmdarg *ca)
> > >   char buf[ICB_MAXGRPLEN + ICB_MAXTOPICLEN + 25];
> > >   struct icb_group *ig = ca->sess->group;
> > >  
> > > - if (strlen(ca->arg) == 0) {
> > > -         (void)snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, "Topic for %s is \"%s\"",
> > > -             ig->name, ig->topic);
> > > + if (ca->arg == NULL) {
> > > +         if (strlen(ig->topic) > 0)
> > > +                 (void)snprintf(buf, sizeof buf,
> > > +                     "Topic for %s is \"%s\"",
> > > +                     ig->name, ig->topic);
> > > +         else
> > > +                 (void)snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, "No topic set for %s",
> > > +                     ig->name);
> > > +         
> > >           icb_status(ca->sess, STATUS_TOPIC, buf);
> > >           return;
> > >   }
> > > Index: usr.sbin/icbd/dns.c
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/icbd/dns.c,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.1
> > > diff -u -p -r1.1 dns.c
> > > --- usr.sbin/icbd/dns.c   23 Jun 2009 13:39:33 -0000      1.1
> > > +++ usr.sbin/icbd/dns.c   30 Dec 2009 19:06:18 -0000
> > > @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ dns_dispatch(int fd, short event, void *
> > >  
> > >   if (read(fd, &ss, ss_len) != ss_len) {
> > >           syslog(LOG_ERR, "dns read: %m");
> > > -         return;
> > > +         exit(1);
> > >   }
> > >  
> > >   if ((gerr = getnameinfo(sa, sa->sa_len,
> > 
> > diff looks correct. ok by me.
> > 
> 
> this diff is not correct.  you don't want to exit dns resolver
> if read returns less then expected.  you want to exit if it returns
> -1.

no. you have to fail if it returns less.
cu
-- 
    paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)

Reply via email to