On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:58:12 +0200
k...@shike2.com wrote:
Hey k0ga,
> safe?. You are not checking any of the return codes. You are only
> moving the problem from some place to another place. Please add
> checks and stop using non portable functions. I don't want your
> shit, thanks.
I just saw that I forgot to amend this part of the patch to this
one here. Will push it later, like the following:
if (strlcpy(..., size) >= size)
...
The only reason why strlcpy is "non-portable" is because the
Posix-committee has sticks up their asses (same with the
glibc guys).
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
