On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 22:29:42 +0100 Matthew Parnell <m...@parnmatt.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi Quentin, Hi Matthew, > I like this simplification a lot, I believe it covers the dependency > resolution that Laslo pointed out earlier today; and yet cleans things > up nicely. > I'd very much like to see this merged. I've just sent an updated patch to cover more precisely which object depends on which header, should be better now. Thanks! -- Quentin
