Laslo Hunhold wrote: > I understand the reasons for the switch, most prominently the security > implications for people visiting suckless.org with the Tor-browser > (because SVGs can contain embedded javascript). > Quality-wise though, it sadly is a step down and we should definitely > look for a better solution. See attached images for a comparison at a > higher zooming level. The artifacts seen are due to the biquadratic > scaling algorithm applied to the png on higher scaling levels. > > I like to optimize for the 99% and when people are truly concerned > about security (using Tor), they should disable JavaScript altogether. > Thus, keeping the svg would be my personal preference weighing the pros > and cons. > This is my personal opinion though and I'd love to hear what the others > have to say about this.
Heyho, I thought the Tor Browser has js enabled deliberately to hide in the mass of other users. Basically not having js enabled is a red flag for "this person might be interesting". Did they change that policy? I'd prefer svg as well. --Markus