On February 9, 2019 7:48:34 PM GMT+00:00, Nick <suckless-hack...@njw.name>
wrote:
>Quoth Hiltjo Posthuma:
>> On Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 01:48:34PM +0100, Jan Bessai wrote:
>> > On Sun, Dec 30, 2018 at 02:59:13PM +0100, Jan Bessai wrote:
>> > > Thanks! I've attached the updated patch below.
>> >
>> > Sorry if I'm breaching any rules, but any update on
>accepting/rejecting
>> > the patch?
>> >
>>
>> Rejected
>
>Ignore if you're too busy, but why is this considered bad practise?
>Is there some case of possible shell escaping or something I'm
>failing to see? I just ask for my own education.
I would also be interested in the reason for the rejection. It seems sensible
to me to not let all these shells linger around for no reason.
Cheers,
Silvan
