In Sun, 4 Jul 2021 11:55:53 +0200 Hiltjo Posthuma <hil...@codemadness.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Thanks, but I prefer the current style one. > > I'm not confident this patch doesn't modify any behaviour. > For example I see the `i` variable was removed, but it is actually > important to not modify argv as this causes issues on NetBSD and > OpenBSD process listing (see commit > a5a928bfc1dd049780a45e072cb4ee42de7219bf). > > This is just one example. Unless it fixes a bug I rather keep the > current code. > One my reply, before previous, did not get to archive: > Hm, will look closer. I did not compare original arg.h from st and > tabbed. 20h copied this file from st, so I assued they should be > identical. Could it be if it included some non-english letters? When I reply, I get template with 'In' and 'wrote' words in header at my language, russian. That time I forgot to replace them.
