On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 05:49:06PM -0500, explosion0men...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: explosion-mental <explosion0men...@gmail.com>
>
> no need for `i` so remove the i variable.
>
> :gigachad:
> ---
> dwm.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dwm.c b/dwm.c
> index e5efb6a..c2dcb15 100644
> --- a/dwm.c
> +++ b/dwm.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,6 @@ void
> applyrules(Client *c)
> {
> const char *class, *instance;
> - unsigned int i;
> const Rule *r;
> Monitor *m;
> XClassHint ch = { NULL, NULL };
> @@ -292,8 +291,7 @@ applyrules(Client *c)
> class = ch.res_class ? ch.res_class : broken;
> instance = ch.res_name ? ch.res_name : broken;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < LENGTH(rules); i++) {
> - r = &rules[i];
> + for (r = &rules[0]; r <= &rules[LENGTH(rules) - 1]; r++) {
> if ((!r->title || strstr(c->name, r->title))
> && (!r->class || strstr(class, r->class))
> && (!r->instance || strstr(instance, r->instance)))
> --
> 2.37.2
>
>
The current code-style is more clear.
Please don't use ":gigachad:" or such in commit messages.
--
Kind regards,
Hiltjo
