Thanks for the quick reply! For the MAX2837, we were actually thinking of just disabling the baseband filter via the LPF register. We'll be operating in transmit mode for most of the time anyway, and we can apply digital filters to any received signals we need to clean up.
--Frank On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Michael Ossmann <m...@ossmann.com> wrote: > Frank, > > Yes, you can replace MAX5864 with MAX5865. However, you may still run into > bandwidth limitations from the MAX2837 (31 MHz maximum baseband filter > bandwidth) and SGPIO (our implementation tops out at about 25 Msps). > > Michael > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 06:58:19PM -0700, Frank Liu wrote: > > > > Hey folks, > > > > We're hoping to extend the existing HackRF design to support a wider > > bandwidth. Looking at datasheets, it seems that we can simply replace the > > MAX5864 (22Msps) with a MAX5865 (40Msps) with pretty much no change in > > hardware design. > > > > Was wondering if anybody had tried this already. Our HackRF will be > > "standalone", meaning that we won't be constrained by USB2.0's I/O speed. > > > > Thanks! > > > _______________________________________________ > > HackRF-dev mailing list > > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com > > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev > >
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
