+1 -----Original Message----- From: Konstantin Shvachko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 5:44 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: release 0.1
Just one thing. Let's do it as Doug proposed earlier hadoop dfs -check This is a good piece of code, but too far from what the real fsck should do to deserve the name :-) I mean sooner or later somebody will write a real fsck, and we will have to call it something else. --Konst Andrzej Bialecki wrote: > Doug Cutting wrote: > >> Andrzej Bialecki wrote: >> >>> I would like to commit DFSck before the release, if that's ok. >> >> >> That sounds fine to me. >> >> This week, pre-release, we should be careful: (1) not to make changes >> that might destabilize things; and (2) we should not add new public >> APIs that have not been well-vetted, since once these are in a >> released version it will be harder to modify them. But DFSck is >> primarily a new class that prints something informative, right? So >> it shouldn't break anything, and it doesn't add any public API other >> than DFSck().main(), right? (I can't get through to Jira right >> now...) > > > Right, it doesn't touch anything in the API, just adds a shortcut > "hadoop fsck" to bin/hadoop. >
