[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-195?page=comments#action_12378265 ] 

paul sutter commented on HADOOP-195:
------------------------------------


I checked with Robert Ramey who held the PennySort record for a while, because 
the PennySort runs on a single commodity meachine, so we should all feel 
comfortable with the comparison.

His sort does about 1GB/minute on an ordinary machine.

So,  1880GB on 188 machines should be = 10 minutes sort time + ?? copy time 
(copy should be faster than sort).

If Owen's example is taking 1 hour sort time plus 7 hours copy time, its 
apparent that the biggest win is in improving the copy, and the next important 
task is improving the sort.

David Cossock's sort at Yahoo is very fast, so that is one option if Yahoo is 
interested. 

If  Yahoo isnt interested in contributing that, Robert Ramey may be open to 
doing consulting work in this area. Once the copy times are improved, we'd be 
interested in helping sponsor sort performance improvements.



> transfer map output transfer with http instead of rpc
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: HADOOP-195
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-195
>      Project: Hadoop
>         Type: Improvement

>   Components: mapred
>     Versions: 0.2
>     Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>     Assignee: Owen O'Malley
>      Fix For: 0.3

>
> The data transfer of the map output should be transfered via http instead 
> rpc, because rpc is very slow for this application and the timeout behavior 
> is suboptimal. (server sends data and client ignores it because it took more 
> than 10 seconds to be received.)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to