[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-226?page=all ]
Doug Cutting updated HADOOP-226:
--------------------------------
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Resolution: Fixed
I just committed this. Thanks Bryan!
Please submit new issues for the other aspects of this that remain unfixed.
> DFSShell problems. Incorrect block replication detection in fsck.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-226
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-226
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: dfs
> Affects Versions: 0.4.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Konstantin Shvachko
> Fix For: 0.5.0
>
> Attachments: fsck.replication.fix.txt
>
>
> 1. We need to adjust Dfsck to the new per-file replication feature.
> fsck checks block replication based on the configured global replication
> parameter.
> Which is now just the default. The actual file replication is returned in
> DFSFileInfo.
> So at least the reporting is screwed by that, although I didn't check what
> will happen with
> other options -move and -delete.
> 2. fsck throws NullPointerException if you type
> bin/hadoop fsck -files /doc
> instead of
> bin/hadoop fsck /doc -files
> 3. Unfortunately, there are several commands that throw different kinds of
> Exceptions
> rather than at least printing the usage info, when some of its arguments are
> missing or
> misplaced. ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException is one them. Try
> bin/hadoop dfs -mv
> bin/hadoop dfs -cp
> bin/hadoop dfs -rm
> 4. In general the shell is growing and getting more sophisticated.
> Should we work out a general convention on how the parameters should be
> structured, named,
> short/long version of the keywords, help, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
