[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1053?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12477579
 ] 

David Bowen commented on HADOOP-1053:
-------------------------------------

> The three referenced o.a.h.io classes currently have no other dependencies.

I don't think that is true.  WritableComparator references DataInputBuffer, and 
WritableUtils imports from other packages.

Even if it were true, it would be a fragile "solution" to the identified 
problem, since additional dependencies will creep in over time.

> The stated goal "independent of Hadoop" is nonsensical, as record io is a 
> part of hadoop.

Yes, we should rephrase it.  The goal is or was to make the record i/o 
functionality modular.  I.e. there should be some identifiable (proper) subset 
of Hadoop which supports  the record i/o functionality and can be used 
separately.  Clearly we do not have a consensus that this is a worthwhile goal. 
If we did, I'm sure we could find a better solution, but given that we don't, 
there isn't much point in wasting more time on it.





> Make Record I/O usable from independent of Hadoop
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1053
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1053
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: record
>    Affects Versions: 0.11.2
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar
>         Assigned To: Milind Bhandarkar
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>         Attachments: jute-patch.txt
>
>
> This issue has been created to separate one proposal originally included in 
> HADOOP-941, for which no consensus could be reached. For earlier discussion 
> about the issue, please see HADOOP-941.
> I will summarize the proposal here.  We need to provide a way for some users 
> who want to use record I/O framework outside of Hadoop.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to