[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1069?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478861
]
Doug Cutting commented on HADOOP-1069:
--------------------------------------
> Our goal is to assign "Jute" a name that is short, memorable and works with
> our goals of defining a top-level package that can be used in many contexts.
The record package is currently a part of Hadoop. If it moves out of Hadoop
then it will require a different name, outside of the org.apache.hadoop
package. If and when that ever happens, then the package name would probably
be changed to match the project name, just as many org.apache.nutch packages
were renamed to be org.apache.hadoop when Hadoop was split from Nutch. Until
then, I see no problems with the package name org.apache.hadoop.record that
warrant changing it. It is in accord with our naming guidelines and
org.apache.hadoop.jute is not: all but project names are descriptive.
> Rename Hadoop record I/O to Jute
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-1069
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1069
> Project: Hadoop
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: record
> Affects Versions: 0.12.0
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Milind Bhandarkar
> Assigned To: Milind Bhandarkar
> Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>
> jute was the original name of the hadoop record i/o component. IMHO, it is
> easier to pronounce, easier to remember and has already stuck among its
> users. This renaming should be done while there isn't a large codebase using
> jute, otherwise it will be very difficult later. rcc will be renamed jrc
> (jute record compiler).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
