Doug Cutting wrote:
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
Actually we discussed this on the Nutch mailing list, and the overall consensus was that for this release we should stick to 0.11.2, since 0.12 still looks too fresh. Do you think we should revisit this issue?

I think the experience on big clusters at Yahoo! is that 0.12.1 should be more stable than 0.11.2, but others can confirm that.

Hm.. That's not the impression I have from JIRA and the mailing list. My impression is that even though 0.12.1 is more robust in some situations, the significant changes (checksum filesystem, speculative execution, in memory sorting, improved map output handling, etc, etc) made between these releases introduced many subtle bugs which only now start coming into light.

At the same time, I've had relatively positive experience with 0.11.2 on moderately sized clusters (dozen machines). That's why I proposed that Nutch should use 0.11.2 for the upcoming release.

--
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


Reply via email to