[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12540233
 ] 

Hairong Kuang commented on HADOOP-1985:
---------------------------------------

Currently in dfs a datanode can get its network location either from the 
command line or by running a pluggable script at the startup time. The property 
is defined in the default configuration file as below.

<property>
  <name>dfs.network.script</name>
  <value></value>
  <description>
        Specifies a script name that print the network location path
        of the current machine.
  </description>
</property>


> Abstract node to switch mapping into a topology service class used by 
> namenode and jobtracker
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-1985
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1985
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: eric baldeschwieler
>            Assignee: Devaraj Das
>
> In order to implement switch locality in MapReduce, we need to have switch 
> location in both the namenode and job tracker.  Currently the namenode asks 
> the data nodes for this info and they run a local script to answer this 
> question.  In our environment and others that I know of there is no reason to 
> push this to each node.  It is easier to maintain a centralized script that 
> maps node DNS names to switch strings.
> I propose that we build a new class that caches known DNS name to switch 
> mappings and invokes a loadable class or a configurable system call to 
> resolve unknown DNS to switch mappings.  We can then add this to the namenode 
> to support the current block to switch mapping needs and simplify the data 
> nodes.  We can also add this same callout to the job tracker and then 
> implement rack locality logic there without needing to chane the filesystem 
> API or the split planning API.
> Not only is this the least intrusive path to building racklocal MR I can ID, 
> it is also future compatible to future infrastructures that may derive 
> topology on the fly, etc, etc...

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to