I don't mean to ruffle any feathers. I just want to make sure that
the really critical issues are labeled as such.
In order to try and clarify what I think the priorities should mean,
here's a wiki page I put together:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-hadoop/Hbase/
IssuePriorityGuidelines#preview
If I'm way off base on these categories, let me know.
-Bryan
On Dec 5, 2007, at 3:18 PM, edward yoon wrote:
I think this is a very subjective judgment of some application
ability.
------------------------------
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
Home : http://www.udanax.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 15:01:41 -0800
Subject: RE: Reprioritize HBase issues in JIRA
Yes, that would be a big help. Go for it! And thanks for the help.
---
Jim Kellerman, Senior Engineer; Powerset
-----Original Message-----
From: Bryan Duxbury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 2:59 PM
To: hadoop-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Reprioritize HBase issues in JIRA
Hey all,
It seems to me like there's a lot of mis-prioritized HBase
issues in the JIRA at the moment, since the default is Major.
I'd like to give it a once-over and reprioritize the tickets,
if no one objects. I think it would make our project easier
to assess at a glance.
-Bryan Duxbury
_________________________________________________________________
Your smile counts. The more smiles you share, the more we donate.
Join in.
www.windowslive.com/smile?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_Wave2_oprsmilewlhmtagline
