[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12769914#action_12769914
]
Hudson commented on HAMA-215:
-----------------------------
-1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12423168/HAMA-215_v01.patch
against trunk revision 828920.
@author +1. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
tests included +1. The patch appears to include 4 new or modified tests.
javadoc +1. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
javac +1. The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler
warnings.
release audit +1. The applied patch does not generate any new release
audit warnings.
findbugs -1. The patch appears to cause Findbugs to fail.
core tests -1. The patch failed core unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/202/testReport/
Checkstyle results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/202/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/202/console
This message is automatically generated.
> Removing hama shell from version 0.2
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HAMA-215
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-215
> Project: Hama
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: shell
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
> Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
> Fix For: 0.2.0
>
> Attachments: HAMA-215.patch, HAMA-215_v01.patch, HAMA-215_v02.patch
>
>
> Since it's not important feature at this time, I'm considering just removing
> it from version 0.2
> What do you think?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
