[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12929996#action_12929996
 ] 

Hudson commented on HAMA-321:
-----------------------------

-1 overall.  Here are the results of testing the latest attachment 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12459142/HAMA-321.patch
against trunk revision 1032869.

    @author +1.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    tests included -1.  The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified 
tests.
                        Please justify why no tests are needed for this patch.

    javadoc +1.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    javac +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new javac compiler 
warnings.

    release audit +1.  The applied patch does not generate any new release 
audit warnings.

    findbugs +1.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.

    core tests +1.  The patch passed core unit tests.

Test results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/288/testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/288/findbugsResult/
Checkstyle results: 
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/288/artifact/trunk/build/test/checkstyle-errors.html
Console output: http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Hama-Patch/288/console

This message is automatically generated.

> Replace the value of "bsp.peers.num" in enterBarrier() method
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HAMA-321
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAMA-321
>             Project: Hama
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: bsp
>    Affects Versions: 0.2.0
>            Reporter: Edward J. Yoon
>            Assignee: Edward J. Yoon
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>         Attachments: HAMA-321.patch
>
>
> Each groomserver handles one instance of BSPPeer.
> Instead of the value of "bsp.peers.num", we should use the number of 
> groomserver.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to