Jukka told us recently that there is no technical requirement for graduation. However, the attention we get should be well used. We should target people that use Hama in production use and they really need some fault tolerance. (I plan it to use as well once we upgraded to YARN).
Based on the new features we implemented in this few weeks, we could slice a new release yes. But I don't see fault tolerance (at least checkpoint recovery) as a new feature rather than a must-have improvement. We have delayed the fault tolerance for now 2 releases, why delay it further? Am 6. März 2012 08:56 schrieb Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>: > Agree. > > Sorry for my short mail, I was mean about new features. I think, we've > added enough new features (MSG Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API > package). > > Should we must add checkpoint recovery to 0.5 road-map? > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Thomas Jungblut > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hy, > > > > we haven't released 0.4.0 at all yet, so why don't we wait for bug > reports > > or feedback? > > > > Am 6. März 2012 01:14 schrieb Edward J. Yoon <[email protected]>: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> What do you think about cutting a release 0.5-incubating with MSG > >> Compressor, Avro RPC, and Graph API package new features and Support > >> Hadoop 1.0? > >> > >> -- > >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > >> @eddieyoon > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thomas Jungblut > > Berlin <[email protected]> > > > > -- > Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon > @eddieyoon > -- Thomas Jungblut Berlin <[email protected]>
