Why do replies never seem to get posted?.. anyway.. sorry if this is a
double post.
I really like the idea of using:
== Hello #{momma}
This has been the biggest problem I've faced since becoming a Haml
user and this would be a very nice solution.
On Feb 8, 7:33 pm, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh, we probably couldn't just "run it through" erb every time. That
> could have some terrible consequences with both security and
> performance. We'd have to compound our processing with the equal
> amount of processing for erb.
>
> Also, I don't want it parsing an output. What if a user generated bit
> had a <% `rm -rf \*` %> ont it? Also, what about the order of
> execution? I mean, if I do...
>
> <%= @start %>
> - @start = "hello"
> = @start
> - @start = "boo"
>
> and you might get
>
> boo
> hello
>
> as your output, because erb might be run after. Or, if it was before,
> you might have side-effects where the <% is run first and can modify
> things in a different order than the Haml interpreting. And, if you
> did them at the same time, then ERB would be *slow*. You'd have to
> have it "start-up" the render engine for every line! Which, is NOT
> what we want.
>
> If anything, I would have Haml precompile the <%= blah %> into the
> buffer as a "marked" section of needing printing.
>
> So, user-data is not parsed for <%= %>. And, it would only happen
> once... at precompile. And it would only happen on some lines.
>
> Heck, maybe we'd even use a marker.
>
> == Hello <%= momma %>
>
> Or do.
>
> == Hello #{momma}
>
> Yeah, actually, I kind of like that last one. Its kind of odd and not
> *everyone* would use it. However, it would be good to have in the
> Haml-toolkit. That would be *SUPER* easy to implement. Simply treat it
> like a
>
> = "Hello #{momma}"
>
> Thoughts?
>
> -hampton.
>
> On 2/8/07, Jeffrey Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 8-Feb-07, at 1:45 PM, Hampton wrote:
> > > Well, we *COULD* do the erb syntax.
>
> > > #tag
> > > fix the <%= thing.name %> boyyyeeee!
>
> > I'm thinking the erb syntax is a good idea. Its function is obvious,
> > which I like. (Everybody knows how erb works). Erb also has the
> > advantage of being easier to implement; since you can just run the
> > pre-compiled template through erb, there's no need to write your own
> > parser.
>
> > /Jeff
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
