No problem. In Haml 1.5, which will be released some time next week, there
will be meaningful error messages that will (hopefully) help this kind of
thing be easier to debug.
- Nathan
On 2/23/07, Rich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Perfect! That was exactly it.
>
> Thanks, Nathan!
>
> On Feb 22, 4:43 pm, "Nex3" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It looks like you have a lot of tabulation on the first line. With
> > Haml, you don't need to (and, in fact, *shouldn't*) do this. The
> > partial will be automatically correctly indented and located within
> > the Haml file.
> >
> > - Nathan
> >
> > On Feb 22, 12:34 pm, "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have a partial:
> >
> > > # _status_item.haml
> >
> > > 1 = text_field_tag "status[#{status_item.id}]",
> > > status_item.status
> > > 2 %br/
> >
> > > That's it. Really simple. But on line 1 I get the following error:
> >
> > > (eval):12: parse error, unexpected kEND, expecting $
> >
> > > Anyone seen this before? Am I missing some convention?
> >
> > > Thanks any tips!
> >
> > > Rich
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
