I have gotten it down to 2 errors now (actual errors... it says 4, but they are 2) and if I fix them they will most likely break the styles on the site. So, I'll get to them later.
-hampton. On 3/22/07, Hampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A) Designers aren't as familiar with the XHTML spec as I'd like. > B) What kind of person runs validations on people sites anyway? Get a > job! Haml does not require XHTML spec validation, nor will it ever. > C) That being said, this is something that should be fixed. I will fix > it as best I can without breaking the code that the designers wrote or > wasting my time. It was a mistake and I should fix it. > D) It works on all browsers... IE5, 6, 7, Safari, and Firefox. And > *that* I'm proud of. > > -hampton. > > > > On 3/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.projectbreakout.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline > > > > hmmmmm.... > > > > On Mar 22, 8:23 am, "hampton c" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Yes. Haml is definitely being used in > > > production.http://www.projectbreakout.com > > > is a site we just recently launched that is pure-Haml. > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
