Yikes! That's debugging code, and shouldn't have been committed. I've just removed it from trunk.
- Nathan On 5/8/07, Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm using Haml from svn and I noticed some new behavior that breaks my > site, and I was wondering whether the fault is mine or Haml's: > > Basically, I have a template (_logged_in.haml) that displays the > currently logged in user's name if you're logged in. If you're not, > it returns a blank template. With the current svn, this causes it to > throw an exception due to the following code: > > if @buffer.buffer.empty? > if @options[:filename] > raise @template.inspect > end > end > > inside engine.rb > > So my question is, are empty templates OK? My gut feeling is they > should be, but your opinions may differ. If they are, we should add > some tests for them. I was hesitant to produce a patch for this > because I don't know if the above code also catches another error I'm > not aware of that could occur. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
