Well, there are several issues with this. First, it is sort of against the structural ideas of Haml. Also, it's ambiguous... that could just as easily be interpreted as <tr>%td "stuff" %td "stuff" %td "stuff"</tr>.
- Nathan gberz3 wrote: > I know, I know, I'm likely defeating the entire purpose of HAML, yet, > I can't not say something. I'm looking to put tags on the same line > for both space savings as well as intuitive reading. For instance, > I'd like to be able to say the following: > > %html > %body > %table > %tr %td "stuff" %td "stuff" %td "stuff > > . . .instead of: > > %html > %body > %table > %tr > %td "stuff" > %td "stuff" > %td "stuff" > > > This would save space and, in some cases, be easier to decipher. Of > course, I'm not the one behind the code. Thoughts? > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
