On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:48:51 -0700, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > The issue is how form_tag creates it's output. You'll notice in the > Rails docs, it uses the RHTML equivalent of -, <%, as opposed to the > equivalent of =, <%=. This is because form_for outputs directly to the > buffer that's gathering the eventual Haml result string. This is done as > a side effect; you don't need to deal with its return value. It so > happens that it also returns the text it added, so that using = causes > duplication. > > - Nathan
Thanks, I didn't realize that form_for output directly to the buffer, and I guess never even took notice of the fact that all of my rhtml templates used <% instead of <%=. Thanks --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
