On 10/23/07, pimpmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With all the new naming conventions for files in Rails 2.0, can we > expect Sass to follow suit? > > application.css.sass
That would seem to be proper based on the Rails naming conventions, but I frankly, I don't really approve in this case mainly because I don't see Sass as purely a means to generate CSS. A browser could theoretically be made to read Sass as a stylesheet. Sass could be used to generate XSL or some other format. While, by design, it is extremely similar to CSS, it is plausible as a file format in it's own right. This is the main reason I find Haml and Sass to be so appealing, they feel like files rather than code stuffed into files. ------------------------------------------- Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney Devi Web Development [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
