On 3 Dec 2007, at 04:48, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > The gem should be installed with RubyGems - it shouldn't be anywhere > in > your application.
People are increasingly keen to "vendor everything" (http://errtheblog.com/post/2120 ), and I can't see why Haml couldn't/shouldn't work in that setup, but of course it's not Haml's problem if people's Rails projects aren't correctly set up to load it from vendor, which looks like it might be the case here. Cheers, -Tom --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
