And to quote Obie:
"Haml is for structure. It sucks at doing inline formatting... so
don't use it for that!"
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Jacques Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ditto. While I like the additional syntax idea too, once you feel
> comfortable combining Haml and HTML without reservations, you'll be a
> lot happier!
>
> -Jacques
> railsjedi.com
>
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2008, at 11:51 PM, Evgeny wrote:
>
> >
> > Haml is not a prison.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:04 PM, Hendrik Mans
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 22, 5:23 am, Evgeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> IMHO nothing wrong with this HAML :
> >>>
> >>> - animal = "tauren"
> >>> %p
> >>> == I like <strong>#{animal}</strong>!
> >>
> >> Personally, I don't like using this syntax because it makes me break
> >> out of HAML thinking and use standard HTML tags ("<strong>...</
> >> strong>"). Yes, I see the irony in saying this while Hampton
> >> essentially has the same objection about my original suggestion. ;-)
> >>
> >> I don't think I have much of an argument for it beyond personal
> >> preference. I think it would make a nice addition, but of course I
> >> understand your above objections.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hendrik
> >>>
> >>
> >
> > >
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
