Yes, I agree this is nicer. Nathan ought to weigh in though... he's the man in charge. I could put together a changeset if he's too busy but wants the change.
chris On Aug 25, 12:53 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You needn't use my fork anymore. All my changes are in nex3's master > > branch at this time. > > Wow, very good news! > > > Re: the syntax of mixin arguments. I think the idea of making them > > more CSS-like is a good one. How would you handle multiple arguments? > > Your examples only show a single argument. Would they be space > > delimited instead of comma delimited like CSS? > > First I thought everything should be more ruby-like syntax in haml/ > sass, but nowadays I would prefer more close to CSS spirit, because > many people might not be ruby programmers and don't care so much about > ruby syntax. For example I hated variable starting with "!" (why not > with "@"), but now it's ok cos its more close to CSS spirit. > > So from user perspective (still not knowing Sass engine much) I would > be happy with syntax similar to CSS (without commas): > > .content > +column: 600px > .sidebar > +column: 300px last > > Cheers, > Priit --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
