In that case, it's probably a Haml-detection issue. I'll look into it. Sean Santry wrote: > On Oct 7, 2:58 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Okay, it's some sort of problem with how we detect Haml-ness or find the >> Haml template. If you apply the attached patch to Haml, does it work? >> > > No dice... > > > >
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
