Mislav Marohnić wrote: > Nathan: don't expect this to handle all the spaghetti erb out there, > but I think html2haml is actually much more usable with my commits and > greatly reduces (but not eliminates!) the amount of hand-sanitizing > that we had to do when converting from ugly erb views. Certainly not... both html2haml and css2sass were conceived as quick-and-dirty ways to get some of the manual work done when converting HTML/ERB and CSS to Haml and Sass. This is especially true for html2haml; the fact is that we'd need a full-on Ruby parser and a huge amount of logic to fully support all the legal ERB.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
