I meant not having an equals at all, so
The quick brown fox
would not be interpolated, but
The #...@var} brown fox
would be equivalent to
== The #...@var} brown fox
So instead of the token == specifying interpolation, it would simply
be the presence of #{xxx} in a line.
On 8 Jan, 12:54, "Mislav Marohnić" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's not a bad idea, but since the line would start with "=", it wouldn't be
> immediately obvious that it's an interpolated string until the reader would
> carefully inspect the contents of the line. That's why I think "==" is
> clearer to write.
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 12:34, weepy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Not sure if this has been floated before, but how about an implicit ==
> > if the line contains #{ xxx } ?
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
