I've finally managed to get this working, without using MuMaMo at all; see
http://nex-3.com/posts/79-highlighting-ruby-in-haml-mode for details. It's
pushed to master.

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]>wrote:

> No, no progress yet. I'll definitely push stuff once I start working on it.
>
> The thing about MuMaMo is that, although it is heavy, as far as I can tell
> there's nothing as good for doing what we want.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Mig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Any progress on this?  I just started looking into it last night, not
>> sure if MuMaMo is the best solution, sometimes it can be a little
>> heavy.  If you have done anything towards this, could you throw it on
>> your github?
>>
>> Mig
>>
>> On Jan 7, 3:35 pm, topfunky <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Jan 6, 3:26 pm, "Nathan Weizenbaum" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > The suggested way of writing Haml is with a space after the directive.
>> >
>> > Thanks for the clarification. I'll hack on the syntax highlighting if
>> > I have time.
>> >
>> > Geoffrey Grosenbachhttp://peepcode.com
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to