On Jul 7, 1:49 pm, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I will take a look at your code, it's likely that the approach > you're taking is sub-optimal and there's a better way to do it.
No doubt about it! This is the first time I've written a grid- generator like this, and to write it in a meta-language like Sass has its own troubles. I could've done it in Ruby, yes, I know, but Sass was my desired target. Chris Eppstein <[email protected]> wrote: > I've implemented four frameworks in sass now, and I'm pretty sure the syntax > change you're suggesting isn't going to be widely used. You'd know better than I, then. Chris Eppstein <[email protected]> wrote: > Compass is not just a blueprint port to sass. It is a platform for building > and distributing sass frameworks. I know of three sass frameworks that are > currently being built on top of compass, and the compass website that is being > designed right now will make promoting compass extensions a central part of > the > site. In that case, I promise to put Griddle in there sometime. Like I said, I just really need to test it and polish it up first. Documentation, and such, is sparse and must be moderate before I'd put it with Compass. What I'm looking for, at the present, are designers who aren't afraid to try pre-alpha material and give it a go. I'll be paying close attention to the github issue tracker, believe me. As it stands now, Griddle has half the features of 960 (minus prefix and suffix types) with absolute freedom of grid resolution and width. Nevertheless, it lacks all 960's maturity. Cheers, Flea --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
