Sounds valid, and interesting to me. On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:58 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi! > > I have been using haml almost years now :-) > > Now I have got one small idea, just need your opinion if this does not > go against some fundamental haml way. If not then I would dig deeper > and write some patch or smth. > > Currently: > > %li= nil > > It will return empty element <li></li> however I would prefer if it > does not return anything at all. Why? > > Cos I'm using declarative authorization gem and often write code like: > > %li= link_to "Users", users_path if permitted_to? :manage, :users > > However sometimes I have css style for li elements and empty element > got style as well. So at the moment I have to write code what is not > so nice and one liner any more: > > - if permitted_to? :manage, :users > %li= link_to "Users", users_path > > I have quite many permitted_to? methods in my views, so that's why I > thought I need some global option for Nil not to return any output. > > What do you think? > > Cheers, > Priit > > > -- Dr Nic Williams iPhone and Rails consultants - http://mocra.com Fun with iPhone/Ruby/Rails/Javascript - http://drnicwilliams.com * Surf Report for iPhone - http://mocra.com/projects/surfreport/ * --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
