Can you give examples of how the form builder code you tried to use in Haml, how exactly that didn't work, and what the corresponding ERB code looks like?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:55 AM, grimen <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just had to do this... > > contents = if block_given? > template.is_haml? ? template.capture_haml(&block) : template.capture > (&block) > end > > ...to get a Formtastic form builder to get nested form blocks to work > with HAML. The reason is probably that Formtastic form builder using > some nested procs (in compare to the original Rails form builder) that > HAML don't seem to like - but works perfectly with ERB, it's just Ruby > after all. But, why? Either we missed something, or HAML got a bug > (not into HAML internals, so can't really tell myself). If HAML need > special treatment (like in "our current case": capture_haml vs. > capture), it's breaking one of the most fundamental architecture > design principles, right? I assume it's a bug though. =) > > > grimen > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
