Fair enough. So nex3 is right, it doesn't make sense to merge it to
core and so I'm putting it to my Rango framework 
http://github.com/botanicus/rango.

Mislav: Well you might want to have POST as a (more reasonable?)
default and of course you could overwrite it via %form{method: "GET"}.
And of course using helper means losing the choice of doing .class#id
{attr: value} as I mentioned above, not mention for some things you
don't need to use a framework. But never mind.

Thanks for your opinions,

Jakub Stastny aka botanicus
http://twitter.com/botanicus

On Dec 8, 2:43 pm, Mislav Marohnić <[email protected]> wrote:
> I can't imagine where I would use this. The "type" attribute in a "script"
> element is redundant, and as for forms, not all are POST and I seldom write
> forms tags myself (most frameworks should have helpers for generating them).
>
> This is clearly material for Ruby helpers.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 13:38, botanicus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, helper is a Ruby method, so you can't just use
> > %my_helper#id.class{attr: value}.
>
> > Jakub Stastny aka Botanicus
> >http://twitter.com/botanicus
>
> > On Dec 7, 3:52 pm, Norman Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 12:28 PM, botanicus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > I created a patch which get me the chance to have default attributes
> > > > for a tag, so if I specify Haml::Engine.new(template,
> > > > default_attributes: {script: {type: "text/javascript"}, form:
> > > > {:method: "POST"}}, then all the script tags will have type="text/
> > > > javascript" and all the forms will have method="POST".
>
> > > > I sent a pull request, however nex3's opinion is that it might lead to
> > > > feature bloat in Haml and he recommend me to ask Haml community. So
> > > > I'd like to know your opinion, if you think it is good idea or now and
> > > > why.
>
> > > Perhaps I'm missing something, but can't you accomplish the same thing by
> > > defining the script tag as a Haml helper?
>
> > >http://haml-lang.com/docs/yardoc/Haml/Helpers.html#haml_tag-instance_...
>
> > > --Norman
>
> > --
>
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Haml" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.


Reply via email to