Awesome I'm in favor of the deprecation as well. One issue though. I noticed from Chris' gist that in SCSS we will be using @include to call mixins. What's the point? It feels more verbose and is basically a waste of characters. Why not keep the plus sign for SCSS as well?
Also will 3.0 allow nested level imports? On Sunday, March 7, 2010, Alex Wallace <alexmlwall...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would also prefer $ over ! if for no other reason than !important could > potentially be confused. I'd consider the ! somewhat reserved in css, whereas > $ is accepted for variables. > > Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 7, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Chris Eppstein <ch...@eppsteins.net> wrote: > > Here's the blueprint grid, re-written using scss and taking advantage of all > the language features that are planned in sass3: > https://gist.github.com/13b0e09fc6f29c9dffd3 > > > You can compare this to the current version: > > http://github.com/chriseppstein/compass/blob/master/frameworks/blueprint/stylesheets/blueprint/_grid.sass > > Chris > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Aaron Russell <aaron...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm all for this too. $ makes much more sense than !. Although to be > honest I'm much more excited about the prospect of removing the need > for =. > > I've been using the SCSS syntax a bit (which is great by the way - a > massive step in the right direction), but I do get irked by having to > format styles like: > > div {border = 1px "solid" !green;} > > If I'll soon be able to do: > > div {border: 1px solid $green;} > > ..then my major complain of SASS/SCSS will be dealt with. :) > > > > On Mar 7, 8:42 am, hunkybill <hunkyb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am all for this. $ is common in not only PHP stew but also >> Javascript. ! is NOT!! >> >> Thanks >> >> On Mar 7, 12:43 am, Chris Eppstein <ch...@eppsteins.net> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Let's assume for a second that it didn't create parsing ambiguities. >> >> > Would you really prefer: >> >> > div >> > border: width solid blue >> >> > over: >> >> > div >> > border: $width solid blue >> >> > I think the latter is much more clear from a reader's perspective. >> >> > And without the prefix we could also do horrible things like this: >> >> > solid = dashed; >> > blue = #f00; >> > width = 1px; >> > div >> > border: width solid blue >> >> > which would emit: >> >> > div{ border: 1px dashed red; } >> >> > In a programming language, you're working with variables all the time. They >> > are the most common thing you work with and so it makes sense that you'd >> > optimize the syntax around them, but in sass you're building styles first >> > and variables are secondary -- as such, I feel quite strongly they should >> > be >> > easily identifiable as special. >> >> > Anyways, Nathan has already finished coding all this up and it's on the >> > scss >> > branch. Thanks to everyone for your input. The use of ! as a variable >> > prefix >> > will be deprecated in sass 3. >> >> > chris >> >> > On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Michael Narciso <narke...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > I'd prefer no prefix but would be content with $. >> >> > > Norman Clarke wrote: >> >> > > I strongly agree that $ will be better than !. As far as deprecations go, >> > > perhaps you could go with first a warning for one release cycle, and then >> > > leave it as a non-default configuration option for another release cycle >> > > before eliminating it entirely. >> >> > > On Mar 6, 2010 9:13 PM, "Tobias Adam" <tow...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > I always thought that the "!" prefix tends to be a bit ambiguous >> > > because of its common notion of a logical NOT. >> > > I mean that re > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to h...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > haml+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > -- -Richard Aday -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to h...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to haml+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
