Is it just me, or is Haml 4 slower than Haml 3.2? I created a sample haml
page using html2haml (about 200 lines of haml code), and used the benchmark
script I found
at http://www.coffeepowered.net/2011/06/17/making-haml-faster/:
TIMES = 100
source = open(File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__),
"sample.haml"))).read
puts "Using Haml version: #{Haml::VERSION}"
Benchmark.bmbm do |x|
x.report("Render time") do
TIMES.times do
engine = Haml::Engine.new source
engine.render :ugly => true
end
end
end
With Haml 3.1.4 I get:
Using Haml version: 3.1.4 (Separated Sally)
Rehearsal -----------------------------------------------
Render time 2.170000 0.030000 2.200000 ( 2.195480)
-------------------------------------- total: 2.200000sec
user system total real
Render time 2.140000 0.010000 2.150000 ( 2.160262)
And with Haml 4.0.0 I get:
Using Haml version: 4.0.0
Rehearsal -----------------------------------------------
Render time 2.310000 0.050000 2.360000 ( 2.361094)
-------------------------------------- total: 2.360000sec
user system total real
Render time 2.250000 0.030000 2.280000 ( 2.287790)
I thought Haml 4 was supposed to be faster than 3.1.4? Am I missing
something?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
