Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > In general I have no interest in responding to "LinuxLearner"'s > trolling, but he has made some accusations which I feel I need to > set straight for the record. This is a publicly archived mailing > list and his unfortunate post may be stumbled upon by anyone.
Thanks for clarifying that you have notified, and thus are deemed to be registered, even though, as you seem to confirm, your entry does not actually appear in the register, and as your website does not iterate your registration classes, in fact, no could find out how you process their data, without giving you their data, by asking. Further; that dealing with the ICO, as I deeply suspected, is a complete waste of time, as they are so obviously incompetent, as your experience, shows. Others on the list nearly had me convinced it might be worth my time dealing with them, so thanks for posting your experiences. FWIW, you should have received a registration number from them by return when originally registering. None of this would have happened, had your business published that. ;) > I have not made any accusation of DPA non-compliance in this thread, Quote: "A more legitimate gripe with many sites like Facebook IMHO is that they don't make clear what they are about to do. " This is clearly an allegation of DPA non-compliance, but let's just agree to differ. Sincerely, LL -- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------