Hello,

we are using haproxy for 1 months and it works very well :) !!!!


First we set up a main configuration for testing.

We use a apache and tomcat connected through mod_jk.

Now i want to split the requests into three backends.


The acls contain the following syntax:


acl VHOSTS1 hdr_dom(host) -i www.dom1.com www.dom2.com


To get o good overwiew of our domains i created over than 40 acls, but i getting an error after starting the proxy.


This happens if i using more than 30 acls  in a backend.


use_backend WEB1 if acl1 or acl2 .. acl30 or acl40




So i decided to create only one acl, but i getting an error too!

starting haproxy[ALERT] 060/115647 (12911) : parsing [/etc/haproxy/config:91]: line too long, limit: 2047. [ALERT] 060/115647 (12911) : Error reading configuration file : /etc/haproxy/config



So i have the following questions:
1) How many acls can i use per backend configuration
2) Other soltuions!


Version: 1.3.15.7



Thank you!


regards
Krieger Bernhard













































PREMIUMPROMOTIONS if PP


----- Nachricht von w...@1wt.eu ---------
     Datum: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:26:38 +0100
       Von: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
Antwort an: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
Betreff: Re: Just a small inconsistency in the docs for listening on multiple ports?
        An: Malcolm Turnbull <malc...@loadbalancer.org>
        Cc: haproxy@formilux.org


Hi Malcolm,

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:45:31AM +0000, Malcolm Turnbull wrote:
I'm using haproxy-1.3.15.7.tar.gz for some testing and looking at the
options to bind multiple ports.

The docs imply that you can use a line such as:

listen    VIP_Name :80,:81,:8080-8089

But this gives me :

[ALERT] 056/114217 (18173) : Invalid server address: ':80,'
[ALERT] 056/114217 (18173) : Error reading configuration file :
/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg

However if I break up the ports using <3 per line it works fine:

listen    VIP_Name 192.168.2.83:80
    bind 192.168.2.83:103,192.168.2.83:102
    bind 192.168.2.83:104,192.168.2.83:105

Is this a deliberate feature change? (not a major issue but just
wanted to check)

No it's a bug reported by Laurent Dolosor and fixed by Krzysztof
Oledzki last month, it's just that I have not released a new release
with that alone yet.  I think I'll have to find some time to release
1.3.15.8 this week-end.  If time is enough, I'll try to also backport
my work on the doc.

If you want, you can download patch 1d62e33b0108a1da634c1936605235635df3081d
on the git web interface ("[BUG] Fix listen & more of 2 couples <ip>:<port>").

Regards,
Willy





----- Ende der Nachricht von w...@1wt.eu -----



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


Reply via email to