On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust <janfr...@tanso.net> wrote: > On 2009-04-22, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <jfs.wo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> A clear error on start up and description of how to resolve would be >>> useful I guess, but then I guess haproxy wouldn't know it was being >>> blocked by selinux policy? >> >> nope... Unless there were some kind of a "standard" way to inform an >> application (in which case, of course, the app would have to be >> programmed for that). > > Yes, I think it's supposed to be up to the OS to notify the admin here > via logs, popups or email.. I always have a > > tail -f /var/log/audit/auditd.log|grep avc > > running when I install new services.. Then I immediately see if > something is denied. >
ok. So no protocol then. > >> -jf (too, ha) > > I was considering if two "-jf"'s might be too much, and if I should > find another ha-proxying solution since you were here first :-) > > oh come on - you shouldnt have to do that... Like where would you go to find as good a load balancer as haproxy? ;) -jf -- In the meantime, here is your PSA: "It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help." -- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228