Witalis, Is the LVS instance and the Haproxy instance on the same server? HAproxy -> LVS DR (local node) is not possible, HAproxy -> LVS NAT can be done with the latest kernel or a patched one.
If they are on separate nodes I don't see why it wouldn't work. 2009/8/18 Witold Duranek <witold.dura...@medforum.pl> > > Hi, > > I am having small architecture of two apache server with LVS loadbalancer in > DR mode. I've installed haproxy (1.3.20) in front of eache apache server to > protect them against slowloris with this haproxy config: > > > everything seems to be ok, but unfortunately after couple seconds apache is > stop responding and haproxy send a lot of 503 errors > > Aug 14 13:04:00 dwww1 haproxy[12565]: 95.*.*.*:39283 > [14/Aug/2009:13:03:48.680] public apache/dwww1 16/0/-1/-1/12032 503 34 - - > sC-- 49/49/49/49/2 0/0 "GE > T / HTTP/1.0" > > i also trying to disable keepalive and running only one apache server (one > with haproxy) in LVS with no luck > when i omit LVS everthing works. Does anybody have similar problems with > running haproxy with LVS-DR ? > > Kind regards, > witalis > > -- Regards, Malcolm Turnbull. Loadbalancer.org Ltd. Phone: +44 (0)870 443 8779 http://www.loadbalancer.org/
